Santiago Bilinkis | bilinkis.com

work in progress...

Español English


3 comments

Bye Bye Pareto: The new “20/60/20 rule”

Most of you who studied Economics or other social sciences are likely familiar with the “Pareto Rule” or “80/20 Rule”.

The rule was invented when an Italian economist of the 19th Century called Vilfredo Pareto noted, while analyzing the distribution of Income in Italy, that 80% belonged to the richest 20% of the population. The rule was then extended as the “Pareto Rule” to any situation where 80% of the effect can be traced to 20% of the causes and is used in many different fields

All this introduction serves as background to a breakfast I attended a week ago, organized by the Ashoka Support Network. There we attended a presentation by an amazing social entrepreneur called Alberto Croce from Fundación SES.

I could talk a lot about Alberto, but in this post I want to focus on one single aspect of his speech. He mentioned that when someone is trying to promote a social change in a group of people. 20% are very open to it and embrace it easily. Another 20% is completely resistant, no matter how much effort we put. But the secret is in the 60% in between, that does not jump in easily, but can be attracted with the right approach and effort.

What is the catch? That tempted by the Easy 20%, we tend to concentrate our efforts there, not where we can really make a difference.

Of course, this can also be applied to other orders of life, including business. As an example, at Officenet we constantly train our account managers to avoid focusing to much on the 20% of their customers that buy a lot, but do so without us having to do much. Instead, we want them to focus on the 60% that, if we don’t call, would likely not buy or buy somewhere else.

That 20% is in this case our “Comfort Zone”. Seems obvious and somehow with our human weakness we live our lives focusing a good deal of our time daily to that 20%.

That is why the “Croce Rule” - Sorry, Alberto! :-) - is a useful tool in our attempts to take risks. In every situation we can ask ourselves:

- What is in this case my Comfort 20%?

- What is the Resistant 20%?

- Am I focusing my efforts in the tough areas where I feel less comfortable but where I can make a difference?

photo: slurve

There are 3 comments - Add yours!

  1. I enjoyed this article a lot! It is quite interesting to see how you distribute the % among the three zones, and it surely sets a new challange to me…I will try to make the most of it.

  2. Santiago B. says:

    @Gabi: Thanks a lot, Gabi!!! Glad you liked it.

  3. Nic R says:

    Very interesting. I’d really like to know what you think about applying this distribution to people management.
    In my experience, it’s the top 20%, and the bottom 20% of the people that take most of time, while the middle 60% are usually the ones that receive (or require) the least attention.


Leave a Reply


 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up


about me...
Santiago Bilinkis

Riesgo & Risk & Reward is Santiago Bilinkis' blog. Santiago is a serial entrepreneur, who created this blog to ignite a discussion and share his experiences, thoughts and anecdotes.

The main subject will be Entrepreneurship, but he plans to cover a broad range of topics. The common ground will be Risk. Welcome to this adventure!

Subscribe

Don't miss another post...

  • Subscribe to our RSS Feed to keep a track of new posts.
  • Go into our Facebook page and be a fan!
  • Get every new post on your inbox.
  • más discutidores!

    • jblaha
    top

    I want to go...


    I want to vote...